
The text, accompanying a sparkling, snowy image of Kelo's iconic pink house in the Fort Trumbull neighborhood, reads, in its entirety:
Here is my house that you did take
From me to you, this spell I make
Your houses, your homes
Your family, your friends
May they live in misery
That never ends.
I curse you all
May you rot in hell
To each of you
I send this spell
For the rest of your lives
I wish you ill
I send this now
By the power of will
That is one bitter woman!
And, I might add, one lousy poet...
I would say she has reason to be bitter. Take my home from me so that the local tax base can be increased by allowing others to profit from my castle and I would be bitter also. In fact, I am bitter because they did this to her.
I agree oldfogey, what happened to her was wrong.
Yeah, I don't the woman for being bitter.
I don't blame the woman is what I meant to say.
Yes, but casting a spell on them and their family and friends that they may live in "misery that never ends" is a bit overkill.
It's a good thing witchcraft is bull@!$%#.
Right, she's not exactly going about it in the most loving way, but I'd be pretty pissed if someone took my house away from me.
It's a good thing witchcraft is bull@!$%#.
Someone cast a spell at me recently, and I ca
Someone cast a spell at me recently, and I ca
Claus? Wow... that spell IS effective. ;)
I don't know. I feel bad for her, but other's have it a whole lot worse.
Send this to all your friends and they will all quickly disappear.
I feel like "go to hell" would have been more effective than "I curse you all"
I feel like "go to hell" would have been more effective
I kind of doubt we would be talking about it now if she had done that.
I feel like "go to hell" would have been more effective than "I curse you all"
LOL. They should write that back to her...
Wow, and merry christmas to all!!
I feel like the original article, and this one too, should point out exactly who Ms. Kelo is and why she has reason to be angry. (The City of New London took her land by its powers of eminent domain in order to give the land to a developer to increase the city's tax base. She sued all the way to the SCOTUS, and lost.)
Granted, the paper is from New London, so maybe they assume that everyone knows what happened.
This is insane and I believe the suit before SCOTUS must have been made on the wrong grounds. If not, it is time for a 21st Century American Revolution. Somebody tell me where the kegs of tea are stored.
The Kelo decision made big waves last year when it was decided. I'm a little surprised you missed it. Here's Wikipedia's backgrounder on it.
AdipicAcid, I did not miss the news of the Kelo decision. I was dumbfounded but sure it would be revisited by SCOTUS. (And it may be.) I am so excited and anguished here because of my renewed concern for the victims of our system.
SCOTUS ruled. They don't revisit cases. The one opening they left is that the states have the leeway to do what they will and many states are in the process of changing their eminent domain laws to specifically forbid this type of behavior. It's probably the best we'll get for a while, since O'Connor and Rhenquist were both in the minority on this one I think, so the new appointments changed nothing.
There is a large disparity in the way SCOTUS views various portions of our Constitution. I submit they may revisit this case under the equal protection clause.
It will have little effect in the eight states that specifically prohibit the use of eminent domain for economic development except to eliminate blight: Arkansas, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Maine, Montana, South Carolina and Washington.
Why should the citizens of Arkansas be granted protections not afforded to a lady from New London? Don't tell me because those states have specific laws, they all are required to adhere to the equal protection clause. AS IS the State of Connecticut.
I then suggest that if the people are not upheld by the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court needs to be drastically and quickly changed by whatever means available and possible. The tea kegs, please.
Why should the citizens of Massachuessetts be granted protections (same sex marriage) that citizens in Virginia aren't? They've ruled that Kelo type takings are Constitutional. Whether a state chooses to encumber its powers even further is a matter for the citizens of that state to decide.
Personally, I think that a few candidates should run in Connecticut explictly on the platform of amending the state constitution to withdraw that power from the state. An eminent domain taking for a bridge or hospital is at least sensical. For a shopping mall/condo development it is dumb.
"SCOTUS" has always sounded dirty to me. And not hot and sexy dirty. Just kind of mildewy and skanky dirty.
Since it's the Christmas season.. it's only appropriate to quote the Man Himself:
Anyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life in him.
1 John 3:14-16
Eminent Domain seizure of property is bull@!$%#. Like others, I don't blame this woman for her bitterness.
Bravo! Bravo! to Mrs. Kelo!
Not only did she find a creative way to tell the people that stole her property from her to piss off, she managed to do it in a way that was legal, and is reminding all of us of the travesty that was the Kelo Decision.
Nice, very nice.
I hope she remembered to include a little of the hair she had snipped from all of them...for effect, you know.
And I thought I was being all edgy with my "Happy F%#cking Holidays" and snowmen screwing wrapping paper. She's got me so beat.
Nothing like a woman scorned, or so they say. I don't even know that you were playing in her league. ;-)
The headline for this article is so great. I'm picturing "I curse you all" anniversary cards, "I curse you all" graduation cards, etc. Hallmark, are you listening? There's an untapped market out there of angry amateur witches who are currently resorting to making their own cards.
There's gonna be a whole line of hate cards popping up... Instead of "Get Well Soon!" you'll have "Go Ahead And Croak!," and in place of "Happy Thankgiving!" you can have a picture of a turkey with "I Hope You Choke" scrawled underneath.
Eminent domain is just the big and visible version of the government helping corporations to steal from you.
Pseudo-legal reverse Robin-Hood-ism. I think that's the technical term.
I found it absolutely disgusting, though not surprising, that those that were interviewed for the article kept expressing how "childish" she was being, because after all, she received a lot of money for her house.
Money fixes everything and salves any wound, they seem to be saying.
She shouldn't be angry about having the state mug her for her home because they handed her cash.
Stop the world, I want to get off.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |